Tests

Suprema Bioentry Plus FREE Test

• 01/06/2016

Welcome to our free Suprema Biontry Plus test!

The following quicktest shows a summarised and excerpted exmaple on how our full tests look and what kind of information we collect about the devices, in order to give you an overview on what we have to offer.

Each of our large tests address an aspect of the device, like enrolment performance, troughput and much more!

Hand Geometry Reader - Enrolment

• 03/03/2015

Enrolment with the device does not take significantly more time than with devices of different technologies. It is easy to do, and the user will learn proper usage of the device during the enrolment sampling process. The device has memory for 500 users by default and can be expanded (but that depends on the manufacturer, model and distributor). Enrolment performance is as good as the identification performance.

Hand Geometry Reader - Throughput

• 02/18/2015

The device - due to the technology - requires more time for a single identification than other technologies, its outstanding FNMR result more than makes up for it. And while the FNMR values can only be truly interpreted with other factors, the aforementioned results alone mean great performance.

Hand Geometry Reader - Overview

• 02/12/2015

The Handkey II is a robust, and large – compared to the others – biometric identification device. Its appearance suggests industrial use rather than an office environment. The quality of materials is adequate, the design of the casing radiates strength. Apart from the platen (the area where the hand is to be placed), it features a numeric keyboard, a LED display that helps proper positioning and an alphanumeric LED display.

Suprema D-Station - Overview

• 01/10/2015

The Suprema D-Station is an aesthetic, well designed device that befits the demands of our age. The quality of the materials used is adequate and the plastic casing radiates elegance. The system is equipped with two fingerprint scanners, a face recognition camera and an RFID card reader.

Suprema D-Station - Enrolment

• 01/10/2015

The enrolment tests show that the time frame for enrolment should be properly planned, especially for larger organizations. Rejected enrolments ocurred, altough only in small numbers.

Suprema D-Station - Throughput

• 01/10/2015

While the FNMR values can only be truly interpreted with other factors, our results show that the device has an order of magnitude larger FNMR rate than the factory disclosed value. However, this does not mean that the device is bad, in fact, it performed well compared to similar devices.

Considering the ARAD values - the required time for a successful identification - the device performed very well, which allows for a fast and convenient operation for users.

Suprema D-Station - Contaminations

• 01/10/2015

We do not suggest using the device in a contaminated environment, because identification performance degrades so much that it fully hampers normal operation.

Suprema D-Station - Distortions

• 01/10/2015

Our stress tests showed that the device can tolerate a wide range of user behaviours. Neither injuries that may occur in an office environment, nor sample positioning errors affected performance significantly

Suprema D-Station - Positioning errors

• 01/10/2015

Our stress tests showed that the device can tolerate a wide range of user behaviours. Neither injuries that may occur in an office environment, nor sample positioning errors affected performance significantly

iEvo Ultimate - Overview

• 01/10/2015

The iEvo Ultimate is an aesthetic, well designed device that befits the demands of our age. The quality of the materials used is good and the plastic casing radiates elegance. It can find it's place in any environment.

iEvo Ultimate - Enrolment

• 01/10/2015

Enrolment times varied within a rather wide range, but the even the longest values weren't so critical. The process should be planned such that upon mass enrolment, there is adequate time buffer to handle the occasional longer enrolment. It has to be, however, noted, that there were no rejected enrolments.

iEvo Ultimate - Throughput

• 01/10/2015

While the FNMR values can only be truly interpreted with other factors, our results show that the device has rather large FNMR, but not exceptionally. Compared to its "smaller sibling", the iEvo Micro, the performance is noticeably better. As such, the device is in the better part of the category.

Considering the ARAD values - the required time for a successful identification - the device performed averagely. Compared to the iEvo Micro, identification times are longer, the manufacturer traded speed for more reliable identification. Nevertheless, the device can still be conveniently used with these values.

iEvo Ultimate - Contaminations

• 01/10/2015

Dusty environments and powder contaminants reduced performance enough to hamper normal operation, so in such environments, care should be taken.

iEvo Ultimate - Distortions

• 01/10/2015

During our stress tests, the device fared rather well. It resisted many disturbing factor with little exception, but even those did not render the device unusable.

iEvo Ultimate - Positioning errors

• 01/10/2015

During our stress tests, the device fared rather well. It resisted many disturbing factor with little exception, but even those did not render the device unusable.

iEvo Micro - Overview

• 01/10/2015

The iEvo Micro is an aesthetic, well designed device that befits the demands of our age. The quality of the materials used is adequate and the plastic casing radiates elegance. It can find it's place in any environment.

iEvo Micro - Enrolment

• 01/10/2015

Enrolment times varied within a rather wide range, but the even the longest values weren't so critical. The process should be planned such that upon mass enrolment, there is adequate time buffer to handle the occasional longer enrolment. It has to be, however, noted, that there were no rejected enrolments.

iEvo Micro - Throughput

• 01/10/2015

While the FNMR values can only be truly interpreted with other factors, our results show that the device has rather large FNMR, but not exceptionally. Still, it is one of the better ones, considering similar devices. Considering the ARAD values - the required time for a successful identification - the device performed averagely, which allows for a convenient operation for users.

iEvo Micro - Contaminations

• 01/10/2015

Dusty environments and powder contaminants reduced performance enough to hamper normal operation, so in such environments, care should be taken.

iEvo Micro - Distortions

• 01/10/2015

During our stress tests, the device fared rather well. It resisted many disturbing factor with little exception, but even those did not render the device unusable.

iEvo Micro - Positioning errors

• 01/10/2015

During our stress tests, the device fared rather well. It resisted many disturbing factor with little exception, but even those did not render the device unusable.

L1ID - Overview

• 01/10/2015

The L1ID is an aesthetic, well designed device that befits the demands of our age. The quality of the materials used is adequate and the plastic casing radiates dynamism. It can be easily placed in any environment.

L1ID - Enrolment

• 01/10/2015

Our tests revealed that enrolment for this device requires planning and providing an adequate amount of buffer to the time planned. During enrolment, user rejection was rare. The results are good for an average company, but for larger ones, proper planning is unavoidable.

L1ID - Throughput

• 01/10/2015

While the FNMR values can only be truly interpreted with other factors, our results show that the device has an order of magnitude larger FNMR rate than the factory disclosed value, almost quarter of the attempts. This is an average performance compared to similar devices.

L1ID - Contaminations

• 01/10/2015

We do not suggest using the device in contaminated environments, as contaminating the sensor or the sample renders the device unable to successfully identify.

L1ID - Distortions

• 01/10/2015

Our stress tests revealed that the device do not cope with disturbing factors whether they result from environmental conditions or user behaviour.

L1ID - Positioning errors

• 01/10/2015

Our stress tests revealed that the device do not cope with disturbing factors whether they result from environmental conditions or user behaviour.